Portfolio
Compare every project on the same five report families.
Evidence detailsChecking
Not assignedData Date sourceLoading the accepted schedule date.Checking effective role and scopeBounded evidence only · original schedule source remains protectedPortfolio content
An observed concern and a named evidence gap both need attention, but they remain visibly different.
Open the report cell to inspect its review-bound evidence and recovery action.
One project a row and one measurement a column, so a column reads down the account as well as across one project. A check every project misses is one finding about the account; a check no project could answer is a coverage gap, which is why the two are counted apart.
Derived review metadata only. Missing evidence remains WITHHELD, never zero. Attention means an observed concern or a named evidence gap; it is not a project risk score.
Only reading order changes. Values, citations, authority, and review provenance stay fixed.
Reactions are observations; they never change the champion by themselves.
Review status and evidence steps
Steps update from visible page evidence. Blocked and withheld states name the boundary; no completion percentage is inferred.
Discussion questions and talking points
Observed → derived → withheld remains explicit. These talking points stay tied to the selected evidence; they are not an unrestricted database question box.
Unavailable context remains explicitly not supplied.
This talking point preserves the page’s evidence and authority boundary.
